建站
咨詢
售后
建站咨詢
新聞中心
Kevin Kelleher suggested an interesting way to compare programming languages: to describe each in terms of the problem it fixes. The surprising thing is how many, and how well, languages can be described this way.
創(chuàng)新互聯(lián)服務(wù)項(xiàng)目包括虎丘網(wǎng)站建設(shè)、虎丘網(wǎng)站制作、虎丘網(wǎng)頁(yè)制作以及虎丘網(wǎng)絡(luò)營(yíng)銷策劃等。多年來，我們專注于互聯(lián)網(wǎng)行業(yè)，利用自身積累的技術(shù)優(yōu)勢(shì)、行業(yè)經(jīng)驗(yàn)、深度合作伙伴關(guān)系等，向廣大中小型企業(yè)、政府機(jī)構(gòu)等提供互聯(lián)網(wǎng)行業(yè)的解決方案，虎丘網(wǎng)站推廣取得了明顯的社會(huì)效益與經(jīng)濟(jì)效益。目前，我們服務(wù)的客戶以成都為中心已經(jīng)輻射到虎丘省份的部分城市，未來相信會(huì)繼續(xù)擴(kuò)大服務(wù)區(qū)域并繼續(xù)獲得客戶的支持與信任！
Kevin Kelleher 提供了一種很有意思的比較語(yǔ)言的方法：用解決了的問題來描述該語(yǔ)言。令人驚訝的是，竟然有如此多的語(yǔ)言都可以這樣很漂亮的表述。
推薦專題：編程語(yǔ)言排行榜
Algol: Assembly language is too low-level.
Algol: 匯編太底層。
Pascal: Algol doesn't have enough data types.
Pascal: Algol 的數(shù)據(jù)類型太少。
Modula: Pascal is too wimpy for systems programming.
Modula: Pascal 系統(tǒng)編程太弱。
Simula: Algol isn't good enough at simulations.
Simula: Algol 不太適合仿真應(yīng)用。
Smalltalk: Not everything in Simula is an object.
Smalltalk: Simula 中不是所有東西都是對(duì)象。
Fortran: Assembly language is too low-level.
Fortran: 匯編太底層。
Cobol: Fortran is scary.
Cobol: Fortran 太恐怖。
PL/1: Fortran doesn't have enough data types.
PL/1: Fortran 的數(shù)據(jù)類型太少。
Ada: Every existing language is missing something.
Ada: 市面上的每種語(yǔ)言都少了點(diǎn)什么。
Basic: Fortran is scary.
Basic: Fortran 太恐怖。
APL: Fortran isn't good enough at manipulating arrays.
APL: Fortran 處理數(shù)組太弱。
J: APL requires its own character set.
J: APL 需要它自己的字符集。
C: Assemby language is too low-level.
C: 匯編太底層。
C++: C is too low-level.
C++: C太底層。
Java: C++ is a kludge. And Microsoft is going to crush us.
Java: C++太混搭，并且將吃掉我們(Sun)。
C#: Java is controlled by Sun.
C# : Java 是Sun的。
Lisp: Turing Machines are an awkward way to describe computation.
Lisp : 用圖靈機(jī)描述計(jì)算過程太笨拙。
Scheme: MacLisp is a kludge.
Scheme: MacLisp太混搭。
T: Scheme has no libraries.
T: Scheme 沒有庫(kù)。
Common Lisp: There are too many dialects of Lisp.
Common Lisp: Lisp有太多的方言了。
Dylan: Scheme has no libraries, and Lisp syntax is scary.
Dylan: Scheme沒有庫(kù)，并且Lisp語(yǔ)法太恐怖。
Perl: Shell scripts/awk/sed are not enough like programming languages.
Perl : Shell, awk, sed 作為編程語(yǔ)言太弱。
Python: Perl is a kludge.
Python: Perl太恐怖。
Ruby: Perl is a kludge, and Lisp syntax is scary.
Ruby : Perl太恐怖，Lisp語(yǔ)法太恐怖。
Prolog: Programming is not enough like logic.
Prolog: 編程不夠邏輯。
原文：http://article.yeeyan.org/view/legendsland/209592
【編輯推薦】
- 漫談編程語(yǔ)言的數(shù)據(jù)親和力
- 你的編程語(yǔ)言做不到的事情
- IT公司中***的10種編程語(yǔ)言
- 13種最為荒謬但很獨(dú)特的編程語(yǔ)言
- Go編程語(yǔ)言也可以用來編寫Web應(yīng)用？
網(wǎng)站欄目：每一門編程語(yǔ)言都是上輩子折翼的天使
分享鏈接：http://www.dlmjj.cn/article/ccesojj.html
